home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Subject: Re: MiNT 1.10 re-sync
- Date: Thu, 26 May 94 19:53:44 CDT
- From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.north.de>
- In-Reply-To: <m0q6RiY-000ERzC@lloyd.com>; from "Howard Chu" at May 25, 94 3:46 pm
- Message-Id: <9405261753.AA00438@jelal.north.de>
-
- Howard Chu writes:
-
- > As for ground rules - it seems to me that patches that are posted, which get no
- > follow-up comment, are accepted by everyone. Patches that appear to have
- > problems generally cause further discussion, followup patches, etc. Can we
- > assume that any patch that has been posted, that hasn't generated further
- > discussion, should be integrated into the "master tree" ?
-
- sounds useful. athough i'm still testing a followup patch (bigger one)
- to your sticky text one, to reduce fragmentation etc... and i'd like to
- use the sticky bit for it if you don't mind. :)
-
- cheers
- Juergen
- --
- J"urgen Lock / nox@jelal.north.de / UUCP: ..!uunet!unido!uniol!jelal!nox
- ...ohne Gewehr
- PGP public key fingerprint = 8A 18 58 54 03 7B FC 12 1F 8B 63 C7 19 27 CF DA
-